
Americans are absolutely giddy that Obama won the election because it marks a historic change in politics in this country, or at least that's want they want you to think. I thought he was a good candidate, his ideas seemed sound but now since I've looked up his programs I realize he's just another politician.
The Person
Obama is a man with an incredible back story, a real Horatio Alger one at that. He struggled with poverty much of life and was raised to be the successful politician he is today by his mother. He worked in Chicago as a community organizer and eventually entered politics by running for state senate. Once he entered the political arena he was corrupted by the will to win.
The Ascension
State Senate
He won his first campaign by challenging the signatures his opponents collected. By doing this he had everyone else disqualified from the race and he won unopposed. His means of securing his state senate seat are a classic tactic used by the right wing and have no place in politics, much less left wing campaigns, in this country (Source:
PBS Frontline: The Choice). While in the state senate he passed several progressive bills to help the poor and uninsured in his district. He also demonstrated an anti second amendment bias by voting "against letting people argue self-defense in court if charged with violating local weapons bans by using a gun in their home." As well as pushing legislation to limit the amount of handguns a person can buy (Source:
CBS News).
Senator Obama's voting record isn't too disturbing until you realize that he chose not to vote 129 times in the state senate. Instead of voting for or against legislation he voted "present". When you compare this to the overall number of votes it's a little over three percent (Source:
Factcheck.org). It may not sound substantial but it's reasonable for constituents to expect their legislator to vote every time. He pushed for solidly liberal issues like gay rights and social justice but when it came to voting on controversial legislation such as abortion he sat on the sidelines. Representing the people that voted him in to the best of his ability may have stifled his chances to move up and onward in the politics.
A Impressive Speech
At the DNC in '04 Obama was tapped to be the key note speaker. His speech railed against partisans who claim there is no red states and blue states, he spoke about how there is only The United States of America. Everyone cheered, many cried, and commentators were quick to draw comparisons to MLK and JFK. The speech was well written and beautifully delivered by the state senator. Their is a common misconception that Barack Obama wrote that speech for that function, he did not. His staffers had heard that speech tens of times before, he used it on street corners and in churches. For the DNC he just integrated John Kerry's name into it. The public bought into it and he was catapulted to stardom (
His Speech). During the following election he beat hyper conservative Alan Keyes by a forty percent margin.
The Senate
While in the senator Obama sponsored tens of bills and co-sponsored the renewal of the sexist "Violence Against Women Act". If you look at the bills that he helped to bring to a vote he seems like a good legislator but when you look at his overall record you'll notice he's not an agent of change, as his supporters claim him to be. Despite his claims that McCain would just be another third term of Bush, Obama himself voted with the president over forty percent of the time (Source:
CQ Politics). On top of these votes he's also skipped almost half of all of the votes while he's been in the senate (Source:
Wall Street Journal). It's common for people to miss votes when they are running for president but he has missed more than anyone else. This is not only unfair to his constituents but it's also unfair to the public who have the right to know where a candidate, now president elect, stands on an issue.
Present Day
Obama is set to take office on January 20th of 2009. If his actions so far are a fair indicator of his performance as president then we are in for turbulent times. Here's the current run down.
Rahm EmanuelObama's claim was that he would bring change to Washington and bring forth a new era of bipartisanship. So for his chief of staff position he chose a left wing, Clinton throwback whose allegiance to this country is so uncertain that the FBI feels it's necessary to keep an open counter intelligence file on him (source
1,
2). This decision taints Obama's administration before he even takes office. He's surrounding himself with pro-war, "blue dog" democrats and and even some people from the neo-conservative movement.
His Fiscal PolicyIf Obama does indeed follow through with his ideas to cut middle class taxes and revamp the health care system we will continue to be locked into deficit spending. Over the past decades no president has eliminated the deficit (including Clinton). If Obama wants to be the candidate for change he must control spending and balance the budget. If he causes wages to rise for the American people but overspends, racking up debt in the process, then inflation will negate whatever benefits those wages would brought (Source:
Washington Post). His plan to cure us of our deficit spending is to boost productivity by implementing programs funded by more deficit spending (Source:
Washington Independent). He's planning on continueing with the Bush mindset that no matter what you want to do there will always be money flowing in from Japan, China and the middle east to back you.
Conclusion
The debt, the deficit, and the federal reserve are not an issue, they are the issue. If Obama runs his administration in the red the same way all of his predacessors did then he'll just prove the right wingers right that his "change" rhetoric was hollow. His soical policies are admirable but they are a distraction from the big, often boring, but always important major issues like fiscal dicipline, foreign policy, and learning how to make peace with our enemies instead of preemptively attacking them. I fear that his administration will be much like the last eight years but with a different vocabulary. Replace religious right with progressive left, pro-life for pro-choice and, I think it's likely, replace war with Iraq to war with Iran.
Obama is not change and neither was McCain. We are locked into this terrible two party system where one side is off to the right in all ways and the other side is moderately off to right except on trivial social issues. Three hundred million people cannot be accurately represented by two schools of thought yet we've accepted this as fact. After four years America will realize that Obama isn't change, he's just more of the same.
-Neon